Symbiotic Planet: A New Look at Evolution

Symbiotic Planet: A New Look at Evolution

  • Downloads:6299
  • Type:Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date:2021-07-26 09:53:06
  • Update Date:2025-09-06
  • Status:finish
  • Author:Lynn Margulis
  • ISBN:0465072720
  • Environment:PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle

Summary

Although Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution laid the foundations of modern biology, it did not tell the whole story。 Most remarkably, The Origin of Species said very little about, of all things, the origins of species。 Darwin and his modern successors have shown very convincingly how inherited variations are naturally selected, but they leave unanswered how variant organisms come to be in the first place。In Symbiotic Planet, renowned scientist Lynn Margulis shows that symbiosis, which simply means members of different species living in physical contact with each other, is crucial to the origins of evolutionary novelty。 Ranging from bacteria, the smallest kinds of life, to the largest—the living Earth itself—Margulis explains the symbiotic origins of many of evolution’s most important innovations。 The very cells we’re made of started as symbiotic unions of different kinds of bacteria。 Sex—and its inevitable corollary, death—arose when failed attempts at cannibalism resulted in seasonally repeated mergers of some of our tiniest ancestors。 Dry land became forested only after symbioses of algae and fungi evolved into plants。 Since all living things are bathed by the same waters and atmosphere, all the inhabitants of Earth belong to a symbiotic union。 Gaia, the finely tuned largest ecosystem of the Earth’s surface, is just symbiosis as seen from space。 Along the way, Margulis describes her initiation into the world of science and the early steps in the present revolution in evolutionary biology; the importance of species classification for how we think about the living world; and the way “academic apartheid” can block scientific advancement。 Written with enthusiasm and authority, this is a book that could change the way you view our living Earth。

Download

Reviews

Ryleigh

I'm looking forward to more Margulis adventures in the science genre。 I'm looking forward to more Margulis adventures in the science genre。 。。。more

André Bernardo

"We people are just like our planetmates。 We cannot put an end to nature; we can only pose a threat to ourselves。 The notion that we can destroy all life, includng bacteria thriving in the water tanks of nuclear power plants or boiling hot vents, is ludicrous。 I hear our nonhuman brethren snickering: "Got along without you before before I met you, gonna get along without you now", they sing about us in harmony。 Most of them, the microbes, the whales, the insects, the seed plants, and the birds, "We people are just like our planetmates。 We cannot put an end to nature; we can only pose a threat to ourselves。 The notion that we can destroy all life, includng bacteria thriving in the water tanks of nuclear power plants or boiling hot vents, is ludicrous。 I hear our nonhuman brethren snickering: "Got along without you before before I met you, gonna get along without you now", they sing about us in harmony。 Most of them, the microbes, the whales, the insects, the seed plants, and the birds, are still singing。 The tropical forest trees are humming to themselves, waiting for us to finish our arrogant logging so they can get back to their business of growth as usual。 And they will continue their cacophonies and harmonies long after we are gone。" 。。。more

Philomena

The Symbiotic Planet: A New Look At Evolution , was a blast that you need to try for yourselves。

L。G。 Cullens

To me, this book is a prime example of how science works in forming inferences from observable basic data and experimentation。 Each inference has its champions and dissenters, and the discord between them over time prompts further scrutiny to either refine and increase our knowledge base, or invalidate an inference。 That in stark contrast to the agenda based pseudo science of our materialistic culture that is intended to distract。Herein is an inference championed by the author an others, that th To me, this book is a prime example of how science works in forming inferences from observable basic data and experimentation。 Each inference has its champions and dissenters, and the discord between them over time prompts further scrutiny to either refine and increase our knowledge base, or invalidate an inference。 That in stark contrast to the agenda based pseudo science of our materialistic culture that is intended to distract。Herein is an inference championed by the author an others, that through the rigorous critical assessment of the scientific approach and further research will hopefully aid in the pursuit of understanding our being。What, to me, distracted from the presentation are the author's focus on herself, a whole chapter about the shortcomings of taxonomic practices, and at times the tone and verboseness。 However, I read this to get a better understanding of SET (serial endosymbiosis theory), where others might enjoy tangental meanderings if only for mental relief :-)I think the writing is fair, and one can glean a basic understanding of SET from the material, along with a verbose clarification of the term Gaia in the final chapter。A succinct explanation of symbiogenesis can be seen at https://en。wikipedia。org/wiki/Symbiog。。。 。。。more

Monica

I recommend The Symbiotic Planet: A New Look At Evolution as an excellent read。

Víctor Avellaneda

Hay un vicio que Lynn Margulis que comparte junto con su ex-esposo Carl Sagan y Richard Dawkins, y es el irse por las ramas en su ensayo, criticar a otros científicos, e incluso dedicar capítulos enteros a sucesos de su vida (por ejemplo, el divorcio de Carl Sagan), que francamente no aportan absolutamente nada a la obra ni a los temas a tratar; además, y lo más repetido, por no decir lo más estereotipado, es que prácticamente se pelean con otros científicos con los que no están de acuerdo, dand Hay un vicio que Lynn Margulis que comparte junto con su ex-esposo Carl Sagan y Richard Dawkins, y es el irse por las ramas en su ensayo, criticar a otros científicos, e incluso dedicar capítulos enteros a sucesos de su vida (por ejemplo, el divorcio de Carl Sagan), que francamente no aportan absolutamente nada a la obra ni a los temas a tratar; además, y lo más repetido, por no decir lo más estereotipado, es que prácticamente se pelean con otros científicos con los que no están de acuerdo, dando una imagen de que un buen científico es aquel que se niega a todo y tiene una actitud pedante y llena de superioridad moral, cuando todos estamos en el mismo barco de estar muy lejos de comprenderlo todo en nuestra realidad。Este libro no es la excepción y me parece que pudo haber sido, sin problemas, un buen ensayo de 40 páginas si las ideas hubieran sido bien hiladas y concretadas。 De hecho, el libro parece más bien una recopilación de datos al azar para justificar la teoría endosimbiótica。 De repente Lynn da por sentado que sabemos la evolución de los hongos y otros taxones y no se detiene a explicar con más paciencia lo que está pasando con su teoría。Hay capítulos enteros donde se pelea con científicos con los que no está de acuerdo y el capítulo final, dedicado a la teoría Gaia, es una sarta de alegatos y refutaciones tan numerosas que resulta en un dolor de cabeza。Un libro que técnicamente está muy mal ejecutado, resulta caótico y deja en segundo plano el objetivo de divulgar y hacer llegar de una manera más accesible el conocimiento científico。Una prueba más de que la divulgación científica tiene serios problemas de comunicación y de procesos de edición en cuanto a corrección de estilo。 。。。more

Alejandro Sierra

Escrito poco más de una década antes de su muerte, se puede considerar un manifiesto científico sobre el origen de la vida compleja multicelular y sobre la Teoría de Gaia, en la que se reconoce a los seres vivos como reguladores activos de las condiciones climáticas y químicas para que el planeta Tierra prevalezca benevolente hacia la vida。 No hacia una especie en particular, mucho menos la insignificante pero muy arrogante especie humana。 Como ya tiene poco más de 20 años, algunos conceptos no Escrito poco más de una década antes de su muerte, se puede considerar un manifiesto científico sobre el origen de la vida compleja multicelular y sobre la Teoría de Gaia, en la que se reconoce a los seres vivos como reguladores activos de las condiciones climáticas y químicas para que el planeta Tierra prevalezca benevolente hacia la vida。 No hacia una especie en particular, mucho menos la insignificante pero muy arrogante especie humana。 Como ya tiene poco más de 20 años, algunos conceptos no están actualizados, como el actual "árbol de la vida", la relación y clasificación de todas las especies vivas, pero muchas ideas son muy importantes para entender la vida, la biodiversidad, la importancia de la simbiosis en la evolución, etc。 。。。more

Jacob Wren

Two short passages from Symbiotic Planet:*Life is a planetary level phenomenon and the Earth has been alive for at least 3000 million years。 To me the human move to take responsibility for the living Earth is laughable - the rhetoric of the powerless。 The planet takes care of us, not we of it。 Our self inflated moral imperative to guide a wayward Earth or heal a sick planet is evidence of our immense capacity for self-delusion。 Rather, we need to protect us from ourselves。 *So far the only way i Two short passages from Symbiotic Planet:*Life is a planetary level phenomenon and the Earth has been alive for at least 3000 million years。 To me the human move to take responsibility for the living Earth is laughable - the rhetoric of the powerless。 The planet takes care of us, not we of it。 Our self inflated moral imperative to guide a wayward Earth or heal a sick planet is evidence of our immense capacity for self-delusion。 Rather, we need to protect us from ourselves。 *So far the only way in which we humans prove our dominance is by expansion。 We remain brazen, crass, and recent, even as we become more numerous。 Our toughness is a delusion。 Have we the intelligence and discipline to resist our tendency to grow without limit? 。。。more

akemi

Wowa, scientists really love talking shit about politics without having read a single work in that field, eh? Even when I was a dumb wee genetics kid I knew there was something worth hearing from the counterculture。 Seems Lynn Margulis just lumps all cultures together into one big monomyth of ignorance, which her scientific mind cuts through like a prismatic spray。So the good points。Lynn Margulis radically challenges Neo-Darwinism with her theory of endosymbiosis。 Essentially, Darwinists (though Wowa, scientists really love talking shit about politics without having read a single work in that field, eh? Even when I was a dumb wee genetics kid I knew there was something worth hearing from the counterculture。 Seems Lynn Margulis just lumps all cultures together into one big monomyth of ignorance, which her scientific mind cuts through like a prismatic spray。So the good points。Lynn Margulis radically challenges Neo-Darwinism with her theory of endosymbiosis。 Essentially, Darwinists (though perhaps not Darwin himself) saw competition as the sole driving force of evolution。 There is interspecies competition (between species) and intraspecies competition (within species)。 An example of interspecies competition: two different species have overlapping niches。 Mutations in either of the species' gene pools that enable greater exploitation of the environment (absorption, utilisation, expansion, etc), will lead to more successful future populations。 An ongoing arms race ensues, and both species change over evolutionary time。 An example of intraspecies competition: two animals of the same species are courting a mate of the opposite sex。 They're being judged on their ability to build a comfy nest。 The one who is selected and the one who does the selecting will pass on their genes。 The population will shift towards comfph city, with both the desire for comfy nests and the capacity for building comfph surviving。As any humanities student will notice, this understanding of a natural law is suspiciously aligned with capitalist ideology which arose concurrently during the Enlightenment and Western imperialism 。 。 。 we'll come back to this later。Lynn Margulis argues that endosymbiosis is a far more important driver for evolution than competition。 Her theory of endosymbiosis can be understood as the merging of two previously distinct species。 If Darwinian selection branches the tree of life, endosymbiosis merges branches into rhizomal networks。 Visualise two branches of the tree of life coming together and then splitting off into three。 Two of these lines are the original ancestors (who keep trucking along) and the third is the new progeny (who has novel capacities and will likely colonise an uninhabited niche)。 This theory was proposed in the 60's and ridiculed for decades。 It is now taught in high schools。Even though Lynn is against "politics" and implicitly posits "science" as the cure for 。 。 。 well everything (scientists love doing this and it's arrogant and boring as heck), her theory fundamentally challenges Darwinian and capitalist ontologies。 In other words, her theory is political。 She suggests a world whose development came about not through competition and the slow accruement of beneficial mutations, but through the wholesale merging of separate beings with all their genetic matter。 Species proliferate from their interspecies ruptures into one another's lifeworlds, through failed ingestions that lead to indelible biological alliances。 Out of two comes one。 This is an ontological reversal of the most extreme case。Out of this understanding, comes a political revelation that life innovates through mutualism。 In other words, Lynn Margulis reproduces Peter Kropotkin's Mutual Aid argument, at the level of biogenesis。 This is the biological equivalent of the discovery of quantum physics。 It's profound, strange and exuberant。Later on, she connects endosymbiosis to the Gaia theory。 Gaia theory is the idea that earth itself is living, in the sense that it has a metabolism。 A metabolism is simply something that regularly transforms matter (one chemical compound into another chemical compound) through the use of energy (solar, sugar, protein, etc)。 A homeostatic environment is created。 This is not a static (still) environment, but a regulated (flowing) environment。 Things transform, but in a predictable manner。 In other words, constant change creates stability。 Gaia, like endosymbiosis, is the merging of all ecosystems into a greater emergent totality — it is the Tao of Earth。So the bad points。The book kinda ends with Lynn saying heyo, we got no control over anything, Gaia will just do its thing, dumb scientists are dumb and environmentalists succ。Like, she spends all this time, literally undoing the ontology of genetics, and then just doesn't go into its implications。 She makes fun of spiritualist understandings of Gaia, but her own understanding is cynical detachment。 She fails to understand that being apolitical is the political stance of the status quo。It's like she has absolutely no understanding of how Darwin's theories of evolution have reinforced capitalist ideologies, leading to the massive exploitation of Earth's resources towards a state that will, (of course) right itself in due time, but after the death of many, many beings。 I'm pretty nihilistic, but Lynn's detached cynicism is disgusting。 She doesn't seem to understand that the beings on the margins of society will suffer far fucking more than those in the centre driving catastrophic climate change (yes, I'm talking about capitalists)。 Like yeah whoopie! Gaia will never die, but we will。 I don't think life is precious, but I think freedom is, and that freedom is the freedom to live or die however I want。 In such a way, freedom has to be understood as a network of effects that intersect at both micro- and macro-social levels。 It is never individual, but mutually constituted by our environment and our kin (yiff)。 Lynn seem to understand that on a biological level but not on a political one。 She doesn't seem to understand that catastrophic climate change is a tyrannical end determined by the few towards the many。 It is the destruction of freedom through the theft of the future。Her ignorance of politics is most evident in Chapter 2 where she outlines the resistance to her ideas in the 60's-onwards from the scientific community。 While she is right that there are dogmatic scientists who cling to their theories as Platonic ideals, she doesn't understand why this is; and while I appreciate her stress in materialist practices, hers is a materialism of naivety。 Universities organised along capitalist principles of competition lead to neurotic dogmatism, because to be scientifically contested is to be economically undermined。 Competition becomes a threat to one's material existence。 Furthermore, once an institution has gained widespread legitimacy, the critical thought that founded it becomes secondary to its own reproduction。 The effect of institutionalised power in a competitive and hierarchical social field is ignorance, arrogance and gate-keeping。Lynn laments the lack of critical thinking in the scientific community but she fails to understand its material origins。 Anyone who's worked at a university will have experienced the threat of departmental cuts from lowered student numbers (leading to wasteful spending in PR campaigns and petty interdepartmental squabbles) and the auditing of teaching staff performances in relation to student grades (leading to simplified lecture content)。 It's because of such pressures that critical thinking is less and less taught and instead students are taught diagrams, names and dates。 The scientific method comes second place to the reified concept, an infobyte that perfectly resembles the capitalist commodity form。 Lecturers and students begin to resemble the dead facts they hollowly recite。 This is preferable for the university, for critical may lead to the development of not just scientific critique, but also, social critique。 Perhaps Lynn should have paid more attention to the counterculture, instead of denigrating it, because such movements can help us build more grassroots and emancipatory scientific and pedagogical frameworks, that nourish life as a living relation and a mutually-constituted freedom。 。。。more

Alexis Williams

I loved and hated this book。 I loved reading about how bacteria with different traits joined forces to create new species and new kingdoms。 I loved reading about the different kingdoms。 I loved the bits about mycology。 I am glad I read the bit about Gaia theory。I didn't love reading about her life, or the scientific history of every argument ever made。 I usually don't like those parts of biology, but in this case it was consistently arrogant rather than insightful, inspiring or entertaining。 It I loved and hated this book。 I loved reading about how bacteria with different traits joined forces to create new species and new kingdoms。 I loved reading about the different kingdoms。 I loved the bits about mycology。 I am glad I read the bit about Gaia theory。I didn't love reading about her life, or the scientific history of every argument ever made。 I usually don't like those parts of biology, but in this case it was consistently arrogant rather than insightful, inspiring or entertaining。 It was a look at how science works。 Is there a Coles Notes of just the biology? 。。。more

Francisco Valdes

Clarifies a number of grey areas on the evolution of life, its classification and also the role of symbiosis in the evolution of life。Throws light also on the theory of Gaia。Great read。

Dave

A lovely concept。 Endosymbiosis as a means of creating new species and higher order organisms。 Serial endosymbiotic theory (SET) aims to account for the differentiation of five major kingdoms of life through the composition of multiple types of microbes to allow higher order life to emerge。It's a broad survey of SET tracing its origins and highlighting challenges, victories, and social response, peppered with personal anecdote and reflection。 It feels a bit scattered and difficult to follow with A lovely concept。 Endosymbiosis as a means of creating new species and higher order organisms。 Serial endosymbiotic theory (SET) aims to account for the differentiation of five major kingdoms of life through the composition of multiple types of microbes to allow higher order life to emerge。It's a broad survey of SET tracing its origins and highlighting challenges, victories, and social response, peppered with personal anecdote and reflection。 It feels a bit scattered and difficult to follow without rich prior knowledge, and the thread jumps around a bit。。。 but the core idea of SET is so interesting, so it's forgiven。 。。。more

Persephonie

"We can group life into three or five or a million categories, but life itself will elude us。"Wowza。 This was a read。 It wasn't overly long (about 130 pages not including the notes and index sections) which was great for me, because if it was an longer I may not have made it。 There were parts I found interesting and even poetic from Margulis, but on the whole I found this to be rather dry and unapproachable for someone who doesn't come from an extensive scientific background。 Definitely not a bo "We can group life into three or five or a million categories, but life itself will elude us。"Wowza。 This was a read。 It wasn't overly long (about 130 pages not including the notes and index sections) which was great for me, because if it was an longer I may not have made it。 There were parts I found interesting and even poetic from Margulis, but on the whole I found this to be rather dry and unapproachable for someone who doesn't come from an extensive scientific background。 Definitely not a book to take on lightly of you don't regularly ingest some form of scientific content。 There was a lot of heavy jargon and name dropping of various scientists and their work。 I read this for a college course and can see the value in it from an academic perspective, but I definitely wouldn't have read it casually。 。。。more

Erin Miller

Science!

Christopher O

more like 3。25。I found this book lacking most logical continuity or narrative chronology, but I also found it rather insightful。 It's a shame, the structure。 Margulis is on top of her game and her Serial Endosymbiotic Theory is rich, as is the explanation of scientific Gaia Theory。 However, it seems like a tendency to leave it all to hindsight and explain everything really makes The Symbiotic Planet inaccessible。 Her prose is, at times, accessible--however, she gives no forewarning before launch more like 3。25。I found this book lacking most logical continuity or narrative chronology, but I also found it rather insightful。 It's a shame, the structure。 Margulis is on top of her game and her Serial Endosymbiotic Theory is rich, as is the explanation of scientific Gaia Theory。 However, it seems like a tendency to leave it all to hindsight and explain everything really makes The Symbiotic Planet inaccessible。 Her prose is, at times, accessible--however, she gives no forewarning before launching into a scientific explanation and rattling off the top researchers in the subject area she is speaking on。 Basic essay structure would have done this book wonders。In other news, this is the first science I've read in a long time。 I am eager to see if other scientists have a better grasp on the human language, no hate intended, heehoo。 。。。more

klaus

Scattered but illuminating: for its articulation of symbiogenesis and its centrality to life’s development, for Margulis’s passionate microbe-level view of the world, and for its clearing of the air around Gaia。The memoirish bits, to my mind, actually add a lot, helping locate these concepts amid networks of scientists, discourses, attitudes at a particular moment。 She mentions that one thing she valued in her university training was an emphasis on reading the original writings of pivotal resear Scattered but illuminating: for its articulation of symbiogenesis and its centrality to life’s development, for Margulis’s passionate microbe-level view of the world, and for its clearing of the air around Gaia。The memoirish bits, to my mind, actually add a lot, helping locate these concepts amid networks of scientists, discourses, attitudes at a particular moment。 She mentions that one thing she valued in her university training was an emphasis on reading the original writings of pivotal researchers alongside the more typical, updated textbook syntheses of their ideas。 That’s what we get here, and I think it’s invaluable for understanding late-20th-c biology。 。。。more

Bill

All life is interconnected at its most basic level。 Life evolves through bacterial invasion。 Instead of the host destroying the invader they enter into a sybiotic relationship。 Life regulates the earth keeping it fit for life。 The author refers to this as Gaia。 The book is a middle easy read, that is, is contains many scientifc terms but the author is good at explain these。 I enjoyed it。

Pam

Read this years ago, but I still remember it。 Some of the ideas took root in my thinking and have shaped my ideas about many things。 Want to re-read it here in the COVID-19 pandemic。 Might have time。

Mathias

In short: This book lacks focus and is unsure about what it tries to achieve。。 The result is that key arguments and examples are not worked out and her ideas don't get the space they deserve。 Which is frustrating given some of these are really promising。 On the plus side its language is easy and quite lively。The long: Lynn Margulis is one of the big names of evolutionary microbiology because of her work on endosymbiosis。 It was with great interest that I picked up this book, hoping on getting an In short: This book lacks focus and is unsure about what it tries to achieve。。 The result is that key arguments and examples are not worked out and her ideas don't get the space they deserve。 Which is frustrating given some of these are really promising。 On the plus side its language is easy and quite lively。The long: Lynn Margulis is one of the big names of evolutionary microbiology because of her work on endosymbiosis。 It was with great interest that I picked up this book, hoping on getting another original take on this fascinating subject。 However, halfway through I realized this would not be that fresh breath of air I was hoping for。Giving its short length, just under 130 pages, an ambitious book like this needs focus above all。 And if there's anything it lacks, it's just that。 Margulis doesn't seem to be able to make up her mind where she wants to go with this book。 Is it an autobiographical work were the reader gets an insight in how the scientific community works through the eyes of a key player? Is it a general introduction to the field and her ideas for the layman? A polemical work in which she contrasts her way of looking at things against the general accepted narrative? In the end, one is left wondering what the goal of this tangled mess was。The result is a crippled book that doesn't shine in any of these ways。 The autobiographical parts aren't particularly enlightening, don't develop the ideas presented and come over as self-indulgent。 For a layman some key arguments are not developed well enough, like why she rejects the difference between bacteria and archaea to be a fundamental one (even though it is generally accepted) and examples that could reinforce her arguments are only mentioned passingly。 Good luck in finding the studies she mentions if you don't have access to any scientific database。 Besides all that, she's not always consistent。 In her defence of the Gaia theory of Earth she regrets the fact that Gaia is often personified as a Goddess that controls the planet instead of an emergent property of all living properties on earth, only to call Gaia "a tough bitch, not at all threatened by humans" only a couple of paragraphs later。The 'tragic' aspect of this book is that Margulis' views are interesting but are not getting a chance to be fully developed and supported here。 Quite frankly, this book should not have been published in this state and I think both editor and author realize this to a certain extent。 In the prologue the way she thanks the editor Frucht hints at this: "the appropriate isistence of William Frucht (。。。) on more focused organization and less self-indulgent narrative。" clearly that insistence should have gone a lot further。However, it should be noted that the writing style is clear and accessible which makes it very easy to read。 All in all I would not recommend this book and that this will hopefully not be the final attempt at showing the importance of cooperation, interconnectedness and interaction for life and its evolution in a concise and accessible way。 。。。more

Kalani Williams

As someone who is currently studying evolution for my PhD, symbiotic theory of the mitochondria was my favorite thing I learned about in grade school。 Furthermore, I'm from the same area as Lynn Margulis (which meant I was also a sucker for her perfectly selected Dickinson quotes at the start of each chapter), so I was really excited to finally read one of her books。 I had heard before hand that some of her ideas were more extreme and controversial and I was pleasantly surprised by how clearly a As someone who is currently studying evolution for my PhD, symbiotic theory of the mitochondria was my favorite thing I learned about in grade school。 Furthermore, I'm from the same area as Lynn Margulis (which meant I was also a sucker for her perfectly selected Dickinson quotes at the start of each chapter), so I was really excited to finally read one of her books。 I had heard before hand that some of her ideas were more extreme and controversial and I was pleasantly surprised by how clearly and with what great self awareness she wrote about which of her ideas are accepted and which are more debated。 Of course, as the book is from 1998, there are some ideas she puts forward that have been disproved, or are slightly different than she anticipated。 But even for her time, she will often reference specific people and articles that contradicted her ideas。 While she is clearly biased towards her own hunches, she has no problem giving people easy means to hunt down other ideas and to develop their own opinions。A few places felt particularly out of date, reading the book 20 years later。 The chapter 'Sex Legacy' uses very mammal focused language, unlike the rest of her book, which puts emphasis on diversity of life forms。 It almost felt like she was trying to take advantage of the frankly 'sexy' nature of sex, and tried to make this chapter more accessible for non-scientists。 I am not sure if this was the intended effect or if it would succeed, but it felt weird to suddenly be using such human mindsets when the rest of the book is so microbial language-centric。 This is not to say that this section was without insight, it included many fascinating ways of understanding the evolution of life, but the language occasionally felt out of place。Her last chapter 'Gaia' ends with her contribution to thoughts on human impact on the planet。 She reminds us that we are just another species, and that we are not a separate thing from nature, and therefore cannot really destroy it, we can only make it unlivable for ourselves。 This is true, however she also claims that basically all other animals will be fine despite our actions, but really we are destroying the planet for us and other organisms like us。 She is right that yes, bacteria will survive, humans are not going to stamp out all life on Earth, but the effect that humans are having on our fellow animals, we now know is more substantial than her final passages may lead us to believe。Margulis is the type of scientist who was able to describe major theories that changed the way we view life and evolution because she was unafraid to begin exploration of ideas that were currently lacking in data。 It is visible in this book, the same traits that made her controversial, are what drove her admirable knack for the formation of new hypotheses。 。。。more

Julio Bernad

En Planeta Simbiótico la brillante biologa Lynn Margulis nos habla de la teoria endosimbionte que la haría estar en todos los libros de biologia de bachillerato, aunque nunca se la mencionara mas alla de "eh, niños, ¿recordáis esas gominolas naranjas y verdes de la celula eucariota? Si, si, esas con nombres tan simpáticos, la mitocondria y los cloroplastos。 Pues que sepáis que esas células son bacterias que una célula mas grande se comió y se fusionaron"。 Eso, amigos míos, es capacidad de síntes En Planeta Simbiótico la brillante biologa Lynn Margulis nos habla de la teoria endosimbionte que la haría estar en todos los libros de biologia de bachillerato, aunque nunca se la mencionara mas alla de "eh, niños, ¿recordáis esas gominolas naranjas y verdes de la celula eucariota? Si, si, esas con nombres tan simpáticos, la mitocondria y los cloroplastos。 Pues que sepáis que esas células son bacterias que una célula mas grande se comió y se fusionaron"。 Eso, amigos míos, es capacidad de síntesis。 La teoría endosimbiotica pertenece a esa reducidisima categoría de teorías que asombran por su brillantez y lógica; sorprende que nunca nadie hubiera pensado en ello -que ocurrió, ojo, Margulis lo cuenta en su libro-。 Es una teoría brillante, de la que me hubiera gustado saber mucho mas de lo que se cuenta en el libro, que no deja de ser un resumen accesible pero glorificado de la teoría y de como se puede extrapolar a la ecología planetaria y exoplanetaria: Gaia, y las ideas de Lovelock。 Pero Gaia científica, ojo, Gaia como conjunto de sistemas imbricados, no la interpretación new age de la tierra injuriada y vengadora。 Es un buen libro para adentrarse en el pensamiento de Margulis y sus ideas científicas, y conocer un poco mejor una teoría que permite comprender, de una forma diferente, el origen de la vida y su significado: una nueva dosis de humildad para el ser humano y su ombliguismo。 Desgraciadamente, no me ha podido explicar mucho mas de lo que ya sabia。 Por lo demás, un buen libro。 。。。more

Owen Moorhead

Great introduction to Margulis' theory of symbiogenesis。 It's a fascinating topic and Margulis is an engaging writer。 My only complaint is that, at a slim 120 pages or so, it's pretty cursory。 Great introduction to Margulis' theory of symbiogenesis。 It's a fascinating topic and Margulis is an engaging writer。 My only complaint is that, at a slim 120 pages or so, it's pretty cursory。 。。。more

Noel Cisneros

Un libro de lectura obligada para comprender la evolución y cómo surgió la vida compleja。 Lynn Margulis con un estilo sencillo hace un recorrido que permite entender cómo se dio el proceso por el cual las células eucariotas llegaron a serlo (camino evolutivo del cual descendemos), haciendo un repaso a su propia vida y cómo dio con la Teoría de Endosimbiosis Seriada (SET, en inglés), así como explica la forma en que el planeta es un sistema que permite sostener la vida, la teoría de James Loveloc Un libro de lectura obligada para comprender la evolución y cómo surgió la vida compleja。 Lynn Margulis con un estilo sencillo hace un recorrido que permite entender cómo se dio el proceso por el cual las células eucariotas llegaron a serlo (camino evolutivo del cual descendemos), haciendo un repaso a su propia vida y cómo dio con la Teoría de Endosimbiosis Seriada (SET, en inglés), así como explica la forma en que el planeta es un sistema que permite sostener la vida, la teoría de James Lovelock (Gaia)。 。。。more

Keygan

The ideas were fantastically interesting and thought-provoking (as with Margulis's last book I read, Microcosmos, which was cowritten with her son Dorion Sagan)。 The actual writing style and execution, though, were not great。 Repetitive, incohesive structure, sometimes unclear。 Margulis is not much of a long-form writer。 Still, I was definitely interested enough to read the whole book。 The writing wasn't bad, just not great。 The ideas were fantastically interesting and thought-provoking (as with Margulis's last book I read, Microcosmos, which was cowritten with her son Dorion Sagan)。 The actual writing style and execution, though, were not great。 Repetitive, incohesive structure, sometimes unclear。 Margulis is not much of a long-form writer。 Still, I was definitely interested enough to read the whole book。 The writing wasn't bad, just not great。 。。。more

Wedma

Klappentext beschreibt den Kern dieses Buches sehr gut。 Auf eine sehr persönliche und charmante Art erzählt Lynn Margulis über die Ergebnisse ihrer langjährigen Forschungen und sagt im Wesentlichen, dass sich die früheren Organismen zu komplexeren Individuen nur durch fruchtbare Zusammenarbeit und Symbiose entwickeln konnten。 „Wir bleiben symbiontische Wesen auf einem symbiontischen Planeten。“ S 69。 Es ist nicht viel Text: rund 150 Seiten in 8 Kapitel geordnet, plus ca。 5 S。 Prolog und Nachwort Klappentext beschreibt den Kern dieses Buches sehr gut。 Auf eine sehr persönliche und charmante Art erzählt Lynn Margulis über die Ergebnisse ihrer langjährigen Forschungen und sagt im Wesentlichen, dass sich die früheren Organismen zu komplexeren Individuen nur durch fruchtbare Zusammenarbeit und Symbiose entwickeln konnten。 „Wir bleiben symbiontische Wesen auf einem symbiontischen Planeten。“ S 69。 Es ist nicht viel Text: rund 150 Seiten in 8 Kapitel geordnet, plus ca。 5 S。 Prolog und Nachwort von ca。 16 S。, aber seine Aussagekraft ist beeindruckend wie weitreichend。Man kann dieses Buch in einigen wenigen Sitzungen durchlesen。 Es liest sich sehr angenehm。 Die Autorin hat Ihr Bestes gegeben, ihre Sicht auf die Welt der Mikroorganismen, sowie Ihre Version dessen, wie sich das Leben entfaltet hat, den Laien verständlich zu machen。 Auch deshalb kommt Lynn Margulis sehr sympathisch und so lebendig rüber und macht das Buch sehr lesenswert: Sie liefert einen Film, kein statisches Bild der Entstehung des Lebens。 Sie schildert diese Vorgänge als etwas sehr Lebendiges, Pulsierendes, v。a。 als Kooperation der Individuen, die sich zusammenschließen und so immer neue, komplexere, lebensfähigere Lebensformen erschaffen。Lynn Margulis erklärt das alles sehr anschaulich, z。T。 anhand von Abbildungen/Zeichnungen, die ihre Ausführungen verdeutlichen, und verwendet oft vereinfachende Vergleiche, die ihre Ausführungen sonnenklar erscheinen lassen。 Für wen könnte dieses Buch interessant sein? Vor allem für alle, die gern spannende und erkenntnisreiche Sachbücher lesen, aber auch für Schüler, die sich für das Studium der Mikrobiologie interessieren, vllt gar für Studenten dieses Faches。 Über den Tellerrand zu schauen schadet nicht, v。a。 wenn es um solche weitreichenden Erkenntnisse geht: Wohltuend zu hören, dass nicht der militante Egoismus die grundliegende Regel des Lebens ist, sondern produktive Zusammenarbeit und Symbiose, die Kooperierende weiter nach vorn bringt。 Das Buch ist schön gestaltet: Festeinband in hellem Blau, Umschlagblatt ist glatt, glänzend mit Farbfoto der Autorin hinten。 Jedes Kapitel fängt auf der rechten Seite und mit einem Zitat an。 Personen-Sachregister, 8 S。, hilft gut beim Navigieren, Anmerkungen/Literatur, 5 S。, für diejenigen, die mehr zu den beschriebenen Themen lesen wollen。Man kann viel über dieses Buch schreiben, aber es ist besser, es selbst zu lesen und zu eigener Meinung darüber zu gelangen。Zur Autorin: „Lynn Margulis war Professorin für Biologie an der University of Massachusetts in Amherst und Co-Direktorin des Planetary Biology Internship der NASA。 Sie gehörte viele Jahre der National Academy of Sciences der USA an und hat zahlreiche wissenschaftliche Auszeichnungen erhalten。 Sie ist 2011 verstorben。“Fazit: Spannend, nett geschrieben, für Laien gut geeignet。 Lesenswert! Perfekt als Geschenk。 。。。more

Kurt

This is my first introduction to Margulis as an author, though as someone that tries to follow as much of current research in Biology as possible, I was very much aware of her work involving SET theory, without knowing who she was。 Having said that though, I do have to say I was a little disappointed in this book overall。 My general impression is that Margulis is the type of person that is much smarter than the average Biologist, and has a better grasp of viewing these kinds of concepts in a “bi This is my first introduction to Margulis as an author, though as someone that tries to follow as much of current research in Biology as possible, I was very much aware of her work involving SET theory, without knowing who she was。 Having said that though, I do have to say I was a little disappointed in this book overall。 My general impression is that Margulis is the type of person that is much smarter than the average Biologist, and has a better grasp of viewing these kinds of concepts in a “big-picture” type mentality than the average scientist。 But I just don’t quite feel like that came through in this book very well。 I don’t think very many Biologists think of natural selection as a great source of innovation any more。 It seems to hold better explanatory power for why populations tend to remain stable。 So the quest is try to now explain where and how the innovation of traits comes from。 I was hoping that this book would give me a little better insight into this issue。 It did not。 Certainly Margulis made a good case as to how and why symbiosis is a powerful force in how life evolved on this planet when we are talking about microbes。 But apart from hinting at the fact that there might be more to the story when we move to multi-cellular animals, it kind of fell short。 It seems that the best she could do was to try to relate this idea of symbiosis to the rather unpopular Gaia Theory。 The frustrating thing about this book, is that I’m left with this distinct feeling that Margulis knows much more about these topics than she presented in this book。 I’m left feeling like if I could go have a cup of coffee with her for the afternoon, and have a chance to grill her about why she holds some of these particular views--what she feels is the real evidence for holding these views, I might feel more satisfied with her thesis。 This book spurned my interest enough into Margulis’ work that it has made me add a couple of her books to my to-read list。 But overall, I just wish it could have been a little bit more in-depth and coherent。 。。。more

Niamh

This was an inspiring read - a totally new perspective on evolution and life on planet Earth。 I learned so much。。。 true, groundbreaking science。

Julia Van Etten

This book explained everything to me that was not taught in four years of college biology。

Heather Kat

Came across this book on a tab hopping mission one eve, started looking at the earth as a self contained superorganism and Lynn Margulis's work alongside chemist, Lovelock。 When I found that she was the ex-wife of one of my favourite physicists, Carl Sagan, I decided that I wanted to learn more about her and came across the Symbiotic Planet。 This is an incredible look at the development of living beings and ignited an interest in microbiology that I've never previously cared for。 Margulis has a Came across this book on a tab hopping mission one eve, started looking at the earth as a self contained superorganism and Lynn Margulis's work alongside chemist, Lovelock。 When I found that she was the ex-wife of one of my favourite physicists, Carl Sagan, I decided that I wanted to learn more about her and came across the Symbiotic Planet。 This is an incredible look at the development of living beings and ignited an interest in microbiology that I've never previously cared for。 Margulis has a brilliant writing style, much the way Sagan writes about Physics。Fave quote:"Working together, cells become colonies and colonies become individuals at ever higher levels of organization。"- Lynn Margulis, The Symbiotic Planet 。。。more

Katerina

Well I hated this book! I started it believing I am going to read something scientific about symbiosis, but it was nothing like that。 This book is like an autobiography of Lynn Margulis。 There are so many parts of her personal life combined in between how she evolved to her theory, that becomes tiring。 The book is so poorly ordered, it was absolutely difficult to follow the theory。 As mentioned before it is full of personal moments and criticism of other scientists that do not agree with her the Well I hated this book! I started it believing I am going to read something scientific about symbiosis, but it was nothing like that。 This book is like an autobiography of Lynn Margulis。 There are so many parts of her personal life combined in between how she evolved to her theory, that becomes tiring。 The book is so poorly ordered, it was absolutely difficult to follow the theory。 As mentioned before it is full of personal moments and criticism of other scientists that do not agree with her theory。 I would not recommend it to anybody。 。。。more